The heart of the progressive plan has been revealed

Do you have your “tin foil hat” on? I am about to draws lines of connection between dozens of shadowy groups that are working undercover to destroy the American way of life. These groups meet in secret and use false names to cover their tracks…. oh wait, it’s only a Democrat from California that has shown us the core of the progressive plan to take down America.

In a recent interview the former speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi said:

“Right now there are over 80 million people who are benefiting from the bill,” the California Democrat added. “We can’t roll that back, so we have to find a way to keep it.”

There you have it, spoken out loud for all to hear. Now for those in denial I will spell it out in plain English.

The Democrats, with a majority of representatives in the House, passed what they knew to be an unconstitutional bill. They put a couple of provisions in the bill that small number of people will benefit from quickly so that once the facts are known and the bill is thrown out they can use the few that benefited as victims of the system.

So here we have it. The progressive lunatic left has showed us their plan. Pass unconstitutional bills that have some benefit for a small number of people so that those people can now be victims of the system if the unconstitutional bill is voided. When are people to going to stand up and tell the Democrats that they are not pawns to be used for political gain. When are people going to realize that the Democrats care nothing for the poor other then getting them to vote for what ever dirtbag has a (D) next to their name.

Wake up America!!!

Stop letting politicians use you for their gain. If you cast a vote for any Democrat this November you are sending a message to Washington that it is ok to lie, cheat and steal from the American people. If you don’t mind politicians running your life, then go ahead and vote for the Democrats.


President Obama looks less and less like a leader

This will be short and sweet. I decided to torture myself and listen in on the President’s press conference today, and now I wish I hadn’t. I expected more from a president then Barrack Obama delivered.

Over and over again all he did was cry about the Republican party. Crying how they may vote against his bill. You know, the bill that only one Democrat has signed his name to. Shouldn’t the president complain about the lack of support from his own party first.

Republican or Democrat, when will we see a leader in the White House? I am sick and tired of whiner babies, enough all ready.

President Obama looks to deregulation to help spur economy

source “The Obama administration announced 30 plans Thursday to scale back or eliminate hundreds of federal regulations and save American companies billions of dollars in unnecessary costs.”

I can’t wait for the big government progressives to complain about this one… oh wait, they won’t because their beloved sheppard is the one deregulating.

I don’t care what party is making America a business friendly economy, as long as something gets done. One of the problems conservatives have been suggestion for years now is that there is too much redundant regulations that cost companies millions in compliance costs.

But it is not just me that is skeptical that the President is looking for real change this time: “Regulatory experts and corporate America will be looking to see whether the administration has paid lip service to the idea of scaling back unnecessary regulations or has in fact taken meaningful steps.”

Don’t you love when we get closer to election time and progressives change their game plan: “Obama, cognizant that political attitudes in Washington had turned against using government spending to stimulate the economy, turned to business earlier this year. He dedicated his State of the Union to the notion of American competitiveness, and followed that up with speeches on education and green technology, which he said were crucial to assuring the nation’s top spot in the global economy.” I guess we should hold presidential elections every year so that maybe we can get them to listen to us more often.   (That was sarcastic, I really don’t want yearly elections.)

I hope that this is not to little to late and that we will see more clean up of over regulation.

Are we reaching a point of no return?

No matter where you fall in the debate over Israel and Palestine, you have to admit that our current president is not handling this properly.

It is not appropriate for the president of one country to come out with a statement to the world about his intentions on how to deal with another country prior to speaking. I guess this is the level of foreign diplomacy you get from a 1/3 term senator turned president.

I think my worries really kicked in when I heard a statement from Netanyahu today:

“Peace based on illusions will crash eventually on the rocks of Middle East reality,”

Do you feel comfortable with President Obama driving our country toward those Middle Eastern Rocks?

I only hope that the people of Israel understand that this President does not speak for the majority of Americans, and November 2012 will give us an opportunity to shown them that.

The left wing totalitarian rule

Last month the left wing totalitarian movement won a law suit to force a company to do business where the progressives wanted them to do business. I am speaking about the law suit against Boeing.

Boeing is Americans greatest manufacture of aircraft. As of 2010 they employed over 160,000 Americans. Boeing decided that they needed to create a stable manufacturing facility for produce their newest aircraft, the 787 dream liner, and found a location in South Carolina. They then constructed a $750 million plant in which to produce these aircraft.

They made one mistake that put them on the radar of the left wing totalitarians; South Carolina is a right to work state. This means that labor unions can not force people to join them in order to participate in their chosen field of employment. The progressives then came out to say that the 3,800 jobs this plant would create should be in a unionized state like Washington.

So now the people of South Carolina may loose the opportunity to employee 3,800 of their unemployed, in well paying positions, because progressives are strong arming the government to force Boeing to do what the progressives want them to do.

If Boeing is able to get justice from our legal system and they open their South Carolina plant, they will be able to create 3,800 jobs and increase production of the 787 Dream liner. Both of these benefits will create wealth in America. If the progressives get their way, Boeing will be forced to build these aircraft in Washington state by workers that have no choice but to be in a union and Boeing has to worry about work stoppage every time the union is not happy about something.

Why are progressives against free choice? Why would they rather see America loose it’s place as one of the worlds leaders in aircraft manufacturing?

If the progressive left gets their way, unions will tell you where you can work and when you can work. Totalitarian rule at its best.

Wikipedia: “Totalitarianism (or totalitarian rule) is a political system where the state, usually under the power of a single political person, faction, or class, recognizes no limits to its authority and strives to regulate every aspect of public and private life wherever feasible.”

Hopefully this is evidence the President is finally listening.

November 2, 2010 the American people voted, and in doing so, sent a message to Washington, DC. I believe we are seeing signs that the president heard that message.

In the past the President has tried to sink more and more money in to the socialist housing administration called Fannie Mae, and it’s ugly friend Freddie Mac. Not long ago, January 2010, Obama and the treasury department tried to write a blank check to fund those failed services. It was a bi-partisan effort to stop that from happening, but it was the President leading the efforts to not only pour more of our money down the drain of Fannie/Freddie, he was going to pay bonuses to his friends in charge of those departments of over $2 million.

Then the people spoke November 2010.

On CNN Money today: “The Obama administration on Friday officially unveiled its plan to remake the mortgage market and reduce the government’s role in housing finance by winding down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.”

“…”We are going to start the process of reform now, but we are going to do it responsibly and carefully so that we support the recovery and the process of repair of the housing market,” Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said in a statement.” It good to see that they want to start reform now, even though people like Ron Paul called for reform 7 years ago, but the Democrats stopped the reform and we got the housing crash.

unfortunately the president’s plan is to phase out the funding over the next 7 years, you know… so that a Republican president will have to deal with closing the doors of Fannie/Freddie instead of doing the hard work himself. I guess he is learning from Clinton, pretend to be center and push responsibility to the next president, then hope it makes you look good.

So, is this the beginning of the President’s re-election propaganda push, where he pretends to do what the majority of Americans would like him to do? or, will he promise things that he will not deliver on as usual?

Or better yet, has the president woken up to morning in America?


Obamacare, so good that Barrack gives waivers to 733 groups.

I love seeing all the bloggers and news channels that keep putting out the DNC party message that Americans want Obamacare. I seam to remember a poll that was taking on November 2, 2010 when the majority of Americans told Washington what we thought of Obamacare.

But to make sure the point gets across to the Dem-sheeple, let’s use the facts from a government report. So far the great Department of Health and Human Services reports they have given waivers to 733 entities, this includes corporations, unions and other employment groups. Those 733 groups represent over 2 million Americans who will not be covered by Obamacare restrictions to their medical insurance. I guess thats the price the DNC has to pay in order to be able to force the rest of America to fund their socialist project.

Ok, so I may come across as a bit angry, this is because I am. I am tired of the government telling me what I can and can’t do with the money I earn for my service. I am employed by a company that gets taxed for having me on their payroll. Then I get taxed for earning money. I also get taxed when I want to spend that money, and if I happen to save some of that money so I can pass it on to my children when I pass, the government wants to tax it again. How many times should Uncle Sam be allowed to take from the same dollar?

I have a easy solution to this problem, give Americans the option to opt out of any federal program they do not want to participate in. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare or any future program they can come up with in order to get their hands into my wallet. I will freely sign a contract that allows me to keep the money taken from my paycheck to fund those programs and in return I will not receive any of those “benefits”. I should be FREE to make that decision and suffer the consequences of that decision.

This is what it means to be a free adult in America. You are free to make decisions and to deal with the consequences of those decisions.

Of course the socialists in Washington will not allow us to have that choice because their system would collapse with out the forced participation of as many people as possible. Enough is enough.

I would like to thank 3 brave Democrats

Yesterday the House majority kept a major campaign promise and passed a repeal of Obamacare. Of course the vote went along party lines, with the exception of 3 brave Democrats.

I would like to think Dan Boren of Oklahoma, Mike Ross of Arkansas and Mike McIntyre of North Carolina.

In fact I learned that Rep. Dan Boren made a statement before the elections in 2008 that I would like to thank him for : “Calling him “the most liberal senator” in Congress, Democratic Rep. Dan Boren of Oklahoma told the Associated Press on Tuesday that he won’t endorse the presumptive Democratic nominee.”

These 3 give me hope that the Democratic party may survive the attempted take over by progressives. The GOP is going through it’s cleansing now, I hope the DNC follows suit in 2012.

Proverbs 22:7

Proverbs 22:7 reads: “The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.”

Weather you are a follower of Christ or not, these are powerful words of wisdom. If it makes you feel better you can say you got the advise from George Clason’s classic “The Richest Man in Babylon”.

Simply put, when you barrow money from someone you are not obligated to pay that money back are working to meet that obligation until your debt is paid off. Therefore, as the barrower you are now working for the lender and are an indentured servant until your pay off your debt to them.

So with that concept in mind, who do the people of the United States owe money too due to the National debt we have allowed our representatives to incur, From Reuters report:


  • China: $906.8 billion
  • Japan: $877.4 billion
  • United Kingdom: $477.6 billion
  • Oil exporters, which include Ecuador, Venezuela, Indonesia, Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Algeria, Gabon, Libya, and Nigeria: $213.9 billion.
  • Brazil: $177.6 billion
  • Hong Kong: $139.2 billion
  • Caribbean banking centers, which include Bahamas, Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Netherlands Antilles and Panama: $133.7 billion
  • Russia: $131.6 billion
  • Taiwan: $131.2 billion
  • Canada: $125.2 billion
I tried to do a search and find who, if anyone, owes the United States money and could not find any official number. Some claim Isreal (that I can believe) and most central American countries, but nothing official.
So maybe we should wake up and realize that the Untied States is no long a nation of the people, for the people. In reality we are now a nation of slaves, for the foreign lenders. As long as we have a national debt owed to foreign nations we can not be a free nation.

Why do progressives threaten the jobs of public servants before bureaucrats?

I was reading a current NY Times article and it made a statement on a quote from Timothy Geithner that represents a position from the majority of Democrat/Liberal/Progressive supports. Here is that statement:

“A failure to increase the limit in time would force the Treasury to default on legal obligations and payments to bondholders here and abroad “causing catastrophic damage to the economy,” Mr. Geithner said, threatening the dollar and stopping payments for a range of federal benefits, including military salaries, Social Security and Medicare.”

Lets address the first part of this statement, “A failure to increase the limit in time would force the Treasury to default on legal obligations and payments to bondholders here and abroad”, why? All the debt ceiling does is restrict the governments ability to barrow more funds. So why does that mean we will have to default on legal obligations?

This is a political ploy to scare the American people in to allowing the federal government to print more money and barrow more from foreign governments. If we tell them that they must operate under the debt ceiling, and they must pay all out standing debt interest payments as scheduled, then where is the danger of “catastrophic damage to the economy”?

Yes, the federal government would then have to cut spending somewhere to make sure our bills are paid, now they start with scare tactic number two: “stopping payments for a range of federal benefits, including military salaries, Social Security and Medicare.” This is a lie. Instead they could cut benefits and salaries of non-essential public servants like congress and white house staff. We could lower the cost of the military without reducing our security by closing military bases in non-combat zones and station those soldiers within the borders of our country, this would reduce the upkeep cost and would let those servicemen to spend their pay in American cities which would add to those cities revenue.

There are solutions to problems that do not include creating more debt. We only need to force our representatives to represent us and not themselves. Don’t fall for the progressive scare tactics and make your voice heard.