Today I woke up and had a thought that brought a smile to my face. I will count this thought as the happiest part of the 2012 election cycle. So the thought that I had was that no matter what happens tomorrow, no matter who wins and will be in the President on January 20th is that in 4 years Barack Obama will not be our President.
I know, if Mitt Romney wins then Barry could run again, but I don’t think the Democrats would risk running a looser against the person who bear him. So in 4 years the Democrats would have to run a new candidate and that will show the direction that party plans to go.
If Barack Obama wins, Americans will wait out another 4 years of a bad economy knowing that a new President will take over when he is done. Americans will do all they can to succeed DESPITE the actions of Barack Obama, just like we have tried to do the last 4 years. We did all we could to better our lives, even though we knew he would take credit for any thing positive and push blame to someone else for anything negative, because Americans want to succeed.
Do you have your “tin foil hat” on? I am about to draws lines of connection between dozens of shadowy groups that are working undercover to destroy the American way of life. These groups meet in secret and use false names to cover their tracks…. oh wait, it’s only a Democrat from California that has shown us the core of the progressive plan to take down America.
In a recent interview the former speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi said:
“Right now there are over 80 million people who are benefiting from the bill,” the California Democrat added. “We can’t roll that back, so we have to find a way to keep it.”
There you have it, spoken out loud for all to hear. Now for those in denial I will spell it out in plain English.
The Democrats, with a majority of representatives in the House, passed what they knew to be an unconstitutional bill. They put a couple of provisions in the bill that small number of people will benefit from quickly so that once the facts are known and the bill is thrown out they can use the few that benefited as victims of the system.
So here we have it. The progressive lunatic left has showed us their plan. Pass unconstitutional bills that have some benefit for a small number of people so that those people can now be victims of the system if the unconstitutional bill is voided. When are people to going to stand up and tell the Democrats that they are not pawns to be used for political gain. When are people going to realize that the Democrats care nothing for the poor other then getting them to vote for what ever dirtbag has a (D) next to their name.
Wake up America!!!
Stop letting politicians use you for their gain. If you cast a vote for any Democrat this November you are sending a message to Washington that it is ok to lie, cheat and steal from the American people. If you don’t mind politicians running your life, then go ahead and vote for the Democrats.
This goes along with my last post and it is so disturbing that because it is true NO ONE WILL LISTEN.
Here we have the current Attorney General of the United States saying in a video from 1995, when he was Attorney General of Washington DC, telling us how he wants to go about “brainwashing” children.
How does he suggest the government “brainwash” American children?
The school system – everyday at every level (be repetitive)
Commercials – ad agencies
Community leaders like Jessie Jackson – community organizers
catchy hotlines (ie DARE, or “Just Say No”)
I’m sure Elle Macpherson would jump at the chance to help disarm Americans so it is easier for the socialists to take over.
If you are considering voting for Barrack Obama on November 2012, ask yourself this question… Do you trust him? Do you really think he has your best interests in mind when he puts people like Anita Dunn and Eric Holder in front of your children?
For several years now many conservatives have been warning that the agenda of the left will be to make Americans accept socialism, and another brick has been laid in the road to serfdom.
We first started to see their agenda when Presidential candidate Senator Hillary Clinton corrected the moderator of a debate when he asked her if she considered herself liberal. She responded, “I prefer the word progressive, which has a real American meaning, going back to the progressive era at the beginning of the 20th century.” After that the “progressives” started coming out of the wood work.
Then we had prominent MSNBC hosts and members of President Obama’s administration sing the praises of socialists like Saul Alinsky and Chairman Mao. Chris Matthews and Lawrence O’Donnell mention how current American policies are socialist. Of course we all remember this video of Anita Dunn praising Chairman Mao to high school students. So why does this matter?
Now there are those golden idols of the American mainstream that are working hard to make socialism cool. Americans have a sad obsession over anyone the media tells us is “famous” and we should want to be. So we now have a “super model” named Elle Macpherson has come out as a supporter of President Obama, which she said is her obvious choice because she is a socialist. So while American girls starve themselves to look like her they can also become socialists to think like her.
Watch your TVs and count the number of hollywood “stars” that will casually mention that they are socialists. Watch how many of these false idols will try and lead Americans down that road to serfdom. Then watch how many sheep like Americans will mindlessly follow. It is sad to watch your country die a slow agonizing death when the antidote to it’s disease is easy to apply. Socialism is the disease and the truth is the antidote.
Think for yourself and study the effects of socialism through out history, it does not work. It has only brought on destruction of any nation that tries to adopt it. Fight for freedom and protect the American way found in our constitution.
Is it just me or is Vladimir Putin sounding more and more like Barrack Obama, or is it the other way around?
Putin said on Wednesday that “in these circumstances, the ruling party always expects the opposition to behave in a calm manner and not to rock the boat. But these are vain hopes.
“The opposition exists to make sure that the ruling party, the ruling authorities could hold on to the levers of power more strongly and prove to society the correctness of the country’s development course,” he concluded as deputies rose from their seats to applaud. (source)
Recently President Obama started to move forward with his own ideas with out letting congress debate and vote on these new policies.
“The only way we can truly attack our economic challenges is with bold, bipartisan action in Congress,” White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer told The New York Times.
“The president will continue to pressure Congressional Republicans to put country before party and pass the American Jobs Act, but he believes we cannot wait, so he will act where they won’t.” (source)
When will people realize that our leaders are not working for us any longer. We need public servants in Washington, not dictators.
Democrats? Are you nervous that your party leaders sound a lot like the communists in Russia?
Let me introduce you to a man named Herbert Hoover. As the 31st President of the United States of America he is often listed as one of the worst our country has ever had. Why would he be looked at so poorly? Two words, Great Depression. 8 months after taking Wall street handed the new President the worst economic disaster our country has ever had and it was how he handled that disaster that made President Hoover known as one of our worst presidents.
So what did he do so wrong? There were several landmark policies that Hoover championed as the best solutions to end the depression.
First he believed in public works projects and infrastructure stimulus. Ever hear of the “Hoover Damn”? Hoover asked congress for millions of dollars (because they did not think in billions back then) to build the power generating damn. Yes that damn has provided Nevada and other states with electricity but the jobs created by that projected did nothing to end the great depression.
Secondly he raised taxes on the top tax bracket from 25% to 63%. Yes the top rate was at 25% during one of the largest economic booms in American history, the roaring 20s, so Hoover thought it would be a good idea to raise the top tax rate at the beginning of the great depression. How did that one work out?
Thirdly, if taxing the evil rich didn’t work maybe his plan to increase corporate taxes should have worked. Nope.
Wait a moment, I am having a sense of deja vu here. Hasn’t this been the DNC plan to deal with the current recession? Infrastructure, tax teh rich and tax corporation has been the campaign chants of the DNC. How is that working out? About as good as it did for Hoover.
Yes, there where other policies that did not help, the most obvious was the Smoot-Hawley Tariff. Oh wait, President Obama has been championing “The Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act” that will impose a tariff on China, one of the top owners of US debt.
Will President Obama be remembered as Hoover 2.0? Of course not, because Hoover didn’t have support through out academia for his policies to the level Obama does. The media of the time did not give Hoover a free pass while doing nothing but going after anyone that opposes him. President Obama will be sugar coated for history.
Don’t let the truth be ignored. The DNC is repeating all the mistakes of pass presidents, we need to get on the right direction before it is too late.
Even inAmerica, where the free market has not been allowed in almost a century, we see glimpses of how it works. In a free market the public decides the fate of businesses, they decide the fate of fads and they decide what the best policies for businesses to have are. How does the public do this? With their wallets.
If you do not like the way Nike treats its workers, don’t buy their shoes. Unhappy with GE shipping jobs over seas, don’t buy their appliances. Disappointed with the coverage your insurance agency offers, go to a competitor. The free market is the only way you can have freedom of choice.
In a socialist Democracy, our progressive friends think it is better to have politicians step in and tell businesses what they can and can’t do. So how has that been working in the banking industry lately?
Most people have heard of the new debit card fee Bank of America was planning on charging their customers, I say was because yesterday they announced they where canceling their plans to implement the fee.
I would like to look at two questions. First, why did they consider charging the fee and secondly, why did they cancel.
The first part of the question is up for debate but I feel there is enough evidence to suggest that the fee was introduced to cover the loss of revenue when the Dodd-Frank bill limited the amount of money banks could charge merchants for the use of the debit card charging system. So government intervenes and we get left paying the bill.
The second question is much easier to answer, the free market dictated to the banks that the policy was not going to work. Customers of Bank of America told the bank that they rejected the new fee by pulling out their money and going to other banks and/or credit unions. BoA has since see the error of their policy and have made a change to benefit their customers, WITH OUT GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION. Of course there are politicians saying that “we need a law that restricts what fees banks can charge for debit card use”, but this is foolish. The free market can control those fees, we the people control those fees with out relinquishing power to a politician to do it for us.
I hope the junior socialists of the Democratic party and the progressives learn from this lesson. The free market is the only system that allows the people to have freedom.
WSJ: “The about-face represents a concession to customer sensitivities over fees. Banks have been adding charges in an attempt to make up for billions of dollars in revenue that is expected to vanish as a result of new restrictions on credit cards, debit cards and overdraft policies. A provision in last year’s Dodd-Frank financial-overhaul law halved the amount that banks can charge merchants for accepting debit cards.”